Load balancing: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
0 : 192.168.20.100, \ | 0 : 192.168.20.100, \ | ||
1 : 192.168.30.100 } | 1 : 192.168.30.100 } | ||
This relies on the Jenkins hash. | |||
</source> | </source> | ||
Revision as of 17:57, 14 June 2017
Since nftables v0.7, there is support in place to perform NAT load balancing.
Don't forget the special NAT chain semantics: Only the first packet evaluates the rule, follow up packets rely on conntrack to apply the NAT information.
Round Robin
This method uses the nftables number generator.
The example below is distributing new connections in a round-robin fashion between 192.168.10.100 and 192.168.20.200.
% nft add rule nat prerouting dnat to numgen inc mod 2 map { \
0 : 192.168.10.100, \
1 : 192.168.20.200 }
You can also emulate flow distribution with different backend weights using intervals:
% nft add rule nat prerouting dnat to numgen inc mod 10 map { \
0-5 : 192.168.10.100, \
6-9 : 192.168.20.200 }
The distribution can be based on ports as well:
% nft add rule nat prerouting ip protocol tcp dnat to 192.168.1.100 : numgen inc mod 2 map {\
0 : 4040 ,\
1 : 4050 }
Consistent Hash-based Distribution
Using the nftables internal hashing mechanisms.
% nft add rule x y dnat to jhash ip saddr . tcp dport mod 2 map { \
0 : 192.168.20.100, \
1 : 192.168.30.100 }
This relies on the Jenkins hash.
Using stateless NAT
Despite uncommon, you can perform load balancing also by using stateles NAT as well, using the two mechanisms (round robin and consistent distribution).
Example using round robin:
% nft add rule t c ip protocol tcp ip daddr set 192.168.1.100 \
tcp dport set numgen inc mod 2 map { 0 : 4040 , 1 : 4050 }
Using Direct Server Return (DSR)
TODO.